Bans on texting while driving fail to reduce crash rates as drivers ignore them

Article by Christian Andrei, on September 29, 2010

The results of a study initiated by the Highway Loss Data Institute indicate that crash rates are not reduced even with the bans on texting because motorists choose to ignore the rules. This group, which is funded by the insurance industry, found out that crash rates rose in three of four states that were surveyed where driver texting was banned.

The group focused on the collision claims in the states before and after bans were imposed. Since 2004, laws that banned texting from mobile phones have been enacted in 30 states. Nearly half of this number was enacted just this year. The US Department of Transportation said that over 5,800 traffic deaths in 2003 were linked to distracted driving.

The Obama administration has called for a federal law prohibiting driver texting. In the statement, Adrian Lund, president of the Highway Loss Data Institute and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, said that texting bans failed to reduce crashes. But according to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, the results were misleading. LaHood, in his statement, said that the results didn’t coincide with his agency’s own studies that indicate that when laws are implemented strictly, death rates from distracted driving drop.

The National Safety Council also issued its statement. It said that the report’s “narrow findings” do not indicate that all texting bans fail. It also stated that there’s no evidence that state bans on driver texting cause crashes. The council added that the study was done in the four states “when consistent, uniform and effective enforcement was not in place.”

Allstate Corp., the largest publicly traded US home and auto insurer, said that for texting bans to work, laws have to “combine enforcement and public education.“ Joan Walker, vice president of corporate relations for the Northbrook Illinois-based company, said, “Legislation is only the first step.” She explained that laws have to be strongly enforced for there to be any real impact. [via autonews - sub. required]

Topics: united states

If you liked the article, share on:

Comments

Login or Create new account to add a comment!

Recommended

Nearly all details have been set with regards to the upcoming market introduction of the new Jaguar I-Pace. Its production version was recently previewed at the 2016 Los Angeles Auto...
by - December 8, 2016
WM Motor, a new China-based automaker, recently revealed its forthcoming lineup consisting of affordable electric vehicles. While there is a company is the U.S. that has the same name, they...
by - December 8, 2016
Even when Aston Martin has been mum about the upcoming AM-RB 001 hypercar, Marek Reichman at least has something new to say. In a recent interview with Australia’s Motoring, the...
by - December 8, 2016
The people at Mercedes-Benz are rejoicing. This is simply because for the first time since 1979, Mercedes-Benz has assembled 20,000 – and still counting – examples of the Mercedes-Benz G-Class....
by - December 8, 2016
When Donkervoort Automobielen BV unveiled its Donkervoort D8 GTO-RS limited edition in May 2016, customer interest has been so overwhelming that the Lelystad, Netherlands-based carmaker sold out this one-of-a-kind vehicle...
by - December 8, 2016
Facebook

Youtube Channel

Tip Us
Do you have a tip for us?
Did you film an important event?
Contact us
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Subscribe
Galleries